🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now the government is shut down due to political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker earning average wages pays about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you compare that with what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both an employee and company payments. And, like much of our government's defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be less liability for companies as we no longer have access to workers' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, based on major studies. Maybe one positive aspect amid current situation is that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.